Is it true that "freedom of religion" is a problem only when it promotes false religion.????.

Is it true that "freedom of religion" is a problem only when it promotes false religion.????

...Please NOTE that "freedom of religion" not only promotes one's "false religion" , as qualified 'false' in the eyes of another, BUT that it promotes ANY religion...it self righteously declares that it is right, a right, for each to worship ANY gods. It is this "FREEDOM" that John MacArthur has even turned to in order to defend "the rights of his religion" among the "rights of all religions".

How will you feel when there will be NO "FREEDOM" of religion(s) (or for that matter "FREEDOM" of rights) when King Jesus rules mankind? (John MacArthur even once stated, self righteously, in a radio sermon that there would be "FREEDOM" of rights in Christ's kingdom).

What will all the "Christians" do when King Jesus decrees the CLOSING of all those "Christian" churches which He (as a dictator) JUDGES to be 'unchristian'? They will defiantly and rebelliously turn to their first love, that of "FREEDOM of religions for my religion, my rights".

Franklin Graham gives thanks and glory to "FREEDOM" for protecting his religious rights in Blackpool, England.

Isn't it IRONIC ( and hypocritic) that Franklin Graham gives thanks to and glorifies "FREEDOM" of religion when this SAME "FREEDOM" rebelliously defines, justifies, and proclaims that it is right, a right, for each to worship ANY 'gods'?

...especially when the one and ONLY God , defined solely by His Son Jesus (Who is the ONLY WAY to Him), clearly said that "you shall NOT ( i.e. do NOT have "FREEDOM" to) worship any other among you".

...and in new covenant time...Lord Jesus said ( to satan, ruler of the world) that you shall worship the Lord your 1 God and Him ALONE serve  ( in obedience and love).

Since Franklin gave thanks and glorified this "FREEDOM" for protecting his "religion", it must then be his first love and the "world god' that he gave thanks to.